Re: are /etc/ld.so.conf and ld-elf.so.conf still used by ldconfig(8) ?
From: Igor Pokrovsky (igor.pokrovsky_at_cnrm.meteo.fr)
Date: 06/27/03
- Previous message: Alexey Neyman: "Re: are /etc/ld.so.conf and ld-elf.so.conf still used by ldconfig(8) ?"
- In reply to: Marco Molteni: "are /etc/ld.so.conf and ld-elf.so.conf still used by ldconfig(8) ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:23:09 +0200 To: Marco Molteni <molter@tin.it>
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 03:59:44PM +0200, Marco Molteni wrote:
> I gave a quick look at the ldconfig source and it seems to me that
> /etc/ld.so.conf and /etc/ld-elf.so.conf are not used anymore.
>
> During system startup ldconfig is passed the path set by "ldconfig_paths"
> in /etc/defaults/rc.conf.
>
> If I am correct, could somebody fix the man page? It is misleading.
I agree, but may be it's better to fix ldconfig source to
in order to use /etc/ld.so.conf and /etc/ld-elf.so.conf?
-- Igor _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Alexey Neyman: "Re: are /etc/ld.so.conf and ld-elf.so.conf still used by ldconfig(8) ?"
- In reply to: Marco Molteni: "are /etc/ld.so.conf and ld-elf.so.conf still used by ldconfig(8) ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
