Re: current state of the art / best practice for devfs in a jail ?
From: Robert Watson (rwatson_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 07/04/03
- Previous message: Andreas Heil: "Driver vor Watchdog"
- In reply to: Joshua Oreman: "Re: current state of the art / best practice for devfs in a jail ?"
- Next in thread: Gordon Tetlow: "Re: current state of the art / best practice for devfs in a jail ?"
- Reply: Gordon Tetlow: "Re: current state of the art / best practice for devfs in a jail ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 22:07:57 -0400 (EDT) To: Joshua Oreman <oremanj@www.get-linux.org>
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Joshua Oreman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:00:46AM -0700 or thereabouts, Josh Brooks wrote:
> >
> > I have been researching the various of ways people add devfs to a jail to
> > give the jail certian /dev devices necessary to function ...
>
> Well, all I did was test your research :-)
Gordon Tetlow (victim CC'd) was, I believe, working on changes to rc.d to
allow automatic construction of jails at boot, and part of that was some
best practice devfs rules for jail. Perhaps he could chime in now? :-)
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Andreas Heil: "Driver vor Watchdog"
- In reply to: Joshua Oreman: "Re: current state of the art / best practice for devfs in a jail ?"
- Next in thread: Gordon Tetlow: "Re: current state of the art / best practice for devfs in a jail ?"
- Reply: Gordon Tetlow: "Re: current state of the art / best practice for devfs in a jail ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|