Re: NATD and Address Redirection
From: Yar Tikhiy (yar_at_comp.chem.msu.su)
Date: 07/26/03
- Previous message: Jim Durham: "Re: NATD and Address Redirection"
- In reply to: Clement Laforet: "Re: NATD and Address Redirection"
- Next in thread: Jim Durham: "Re: NATD and Address Redirection"
- Reply: Jim Durham: "Re: NATD and Address Redirection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 11:13:59 +0400 To: Clement Laforet <sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org>
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 02:22:05AM +0200, Clement Laforet wrote:
>
> for incoming traffic, you must use -redirect_address, but for outgoing
> you have to set -alias_address.
> If you want to use a specific public IP to map incoming AND outgoing
> packets, you need to run 2 natd, using ipfw matching.
I'm afraid this is not exactly correct.
IIRC when 5 years ago I was hacking natd and libalias to use them
for transparent HTTP proxying, their internals looked rather clear.
In a nutshell, they were as follows.
There was a translation table inside libalias with 3 columns in it:
the internal connection point (IP&port), alias point, and external
point.
When a packet was heading outside, its source IP&port were matched
against the "internal" column, and its destination IP&port against
the "external" column. If an entry were found, the packet's source
IP&port would be replaced with the values from the "alias" column.
When a packet was going in the opposite direction, inside, its
source IP&port were matched against the "external" column, and its
destination IP&port against the "alias" column. Then the packet's
destination IP&port were replaced with the values from the "internal"
column of the entry found.
By specifying a redirect_address rule, just an entry was inserted
to that table with a wildcard value for all the ports and for the
external IP address. Upon matching, such an entry would clone into
a new one containing the information specific for a particular
session. Thus the solution was symmetric by design, without requiring
2 natd's or additional ipfw rules.
P.S. As I can see, today's libalias still uses the same approach.
-- Yar _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Jim Durham: "Re: NATD and Address Redirection"
- In reply to: Clement Laforet: "Re: NATD and Address Redirection"
- Next in thread: Jim Durham: "Re: NATD and Address Redirection"
- Reply: Jim Durham: "Re: NATD and Address Redirection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|