Re: make -U
From: Juli Mallett (jmallett_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 07/30/03
- Previous message: Ruslan Ermilov: "make -U"
- In reply to: Ruslan Ermilov: "make -U"
- Next in thread: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: make -U"
- Reply: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: make -U"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:23:20 -0500 To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
* Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> [ Date: 2003-07-30 ]
[ w.r.t. make -U ]
> Sorry, I've accidentally dropped an email about `make -U'.
>
> I think that it's not needed, since the functionality can
> easily be achieved by running "make FOO=", i.e., assigning
> an empty value. Remember that command line variables take
> precedence over globals, so the following makefile,
>
> FOO+= bar
>
> all:
> @echo ${FOO}
>
> when run as ``make FOO=foo'', will print just ``foo''.
Does that work for the .if defined() case, too? Makefiles can grow
to be more complex than just that sort of stuff, after all :)
Thanx,
juli. (who admits she missed the rest of the conversation)
-- juli mallett. email: jmallett@freebsd.org; efnet: juli; aim: bsdflata; i have lost my way home early - i don't care cause i won't stay there. _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Ruslan Ermilov: "make -U"
- In reply to: Ruslan Ermilov: "make -U"
- Next in thread: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: make -U"
- Reply: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: make -U"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
