Re: Call for thread testers

From: Gordon Tetlow (gordont_at_gnf.org)
Date: 08/27/03

  • Next message: Fred Clift: "Re: Minimalist FreeBSD 4.8"
    Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:29:42 -0700
    To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
    
    
    

    On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 10:05:28AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
    > All,
    >
    > This is kind of an unconventional call for help. As we approach the
    > release of 5.2, we'd really like to show off the performance and
    > stability of our new threading packages. So, I'm looking for people
    > to volunteer to go out and put some of the thread-capable enterprise
    > and desktop packages to the test. Packages that I would most like
    > to see are:
    >
    > Apache 2
    > BIND 9
    > OpenOffice
    > Mozilla
    > KDE desktop + Konq
    > Java 1.3/1.4 + Tomcat/etc
    > MySQL
    > Others?

    I've found that privoxy is a good program to test threads. It does
    alot of network io too. ports/www/privoxy. Just point your web browser
    to use it.

    > The questions that I would like to have answered are:
    >
    > Does it take advantage of pthreads
    Yes.
    > Does it work with libkse and libthr
    Sort of.
    > Does it operate correctly
    libthr: tends to segfault (sig11). Occasional DNS resolution issues.
    libkse: tends to segfault (sig11), I've gotten my box to crash
            once too (BAD!). ^C still doesn't kill the process.
            Occasional DNS resolution issues. Here's the output from the
            console:

    Aug 27 10:22:41 Privoxy(134991872) Request: images.slashdot.org/greendot.gif
    Aug 27 10:22:41 Privoxy(134979584) Request: images.slashdot.org/pix.gif
    Aug 27 10:22:46 Privoxy(135041024) Error: could not resolve hostname images.slashdot.org
    ^^^^--- This is bad, I have no problems resolving this normally.
    ^CAug 27 10:22:56 Privoxy(135163904) Info: exiting by signal 2 .. bye

    ^CAug 27 10:23:35 Privoxy(135151616) Info: exiting by signal 2 .. bye
    ^CAug 27 10:23:35 Privoxy(135110656) Info: exiting by signal 2 .. bye
    ^CAug 27 10:23:36 Privoxy(135065600) Info: exiting by signal 2 .. bye
    ^CAug 27 10:23:36 Privoxy(135053312) Info: exiting by signal 2 .. bye
    ^CAug 27 10:23:36 Privoxy(134742016) Info: exiting by signal 2 .. bye
    ^^^--- I guess I killed the individual threads.
    ^C^C^C
    ^C^C^C
    ^C^C^C
    ^^^--- Nothing left to kill?
    load: 0.35 cmd: privoxy 1257 [KSE] 0.06u 0.09s 0% 3424k
    ^^^--- I hit ^T here.

    > Does it perform better/worse than with libc_r
    When it worked, it worked better under thr and kse.
    > Does it perform better/worse than under FreeBSD 4.x
    ENOTTESTED

    In short, we aren't there yet.

    -gordon

    
    



  • Next message: Fred Clift: "Re: Minimalist FreeBSD 4.8"

    Relevant Pages

    • [opensuse] Re: gdb/corefile question
      ... One option would be to run the program under catchsegv (i.e. catchsegv ... have the -debuginfo packages of that program (if it comes from a SUSE ... The weird thing is that I do actually get the segfault under gdb, ... any debug information. ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: rekall doesnt work properly on debian
      ... On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 00:18 -0700, Daniel M. wrote: ... > a database front-end, similar to Microsoft's Access, see ... > it crashes with a segfault every couple of minutes when you try to do even ... > of similar issues in rekall's mailing list, and as the program's packages ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: bug report advise needed
      ... after recent upgrade of several packages). ... > The main segfault is about gdm, but it seems from the output that ... To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". ...
      (Debian-User)