Re: Call for thread testers

From: Sean Chittenden (sean_at_chittenden.org)
Date: 08/27/03

  • Next message: Gianmarco Giovannelli: "Re: Minimalist FreeBSD 4.8"
    Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:45:53 -0700
    To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
    
    

    [moving to -threads]

    > This is kind of an unconventional call for help. As we approach the
    > release of 5.2, we'd really like to show off the performance and
    > stability of our new threading packages. So, I'm looking for people
    > to volunteer to go out and put some of the thread-capable enterprise
    > and desktop packages to the test. Packages that I would most like
    > to see are:
    >
    > Apache 2
    > BIND 9
    > OpenOffice
    > Mozilla
    > KDE desktop + Konq
    > Java 1.3/1.4 + Tomcat/etc
    > MySQL
    > Others?
    >
    > The questions that I would like to have answered are:
    >
    > Does it take advantage of pthreads
    > Does it work with libkse and libthr
    > Does it operate correctly
    > Does it perform better/worse than with libc_r
    > Does it perform better/worse than under FreeBSD 4.x

    What's the current status of KSE? Is the project page
    (http://www.FreeBSD.org/kse/) considered up to date by the KSE
    developers? Are the remaining bits for KSE either bug related or
    dealing with ARCH != x86? Are there any remaining/outstanding
    "gotchas"/bugs on the radar/problems that the KSE developers are aware
    of?

    I've heard that the konsole bug has been fixed and there's a patch
    floating around to fix the SIGABRTs for that program (was my biggest
    gripe last time I tested libkse).

    Just trying to figure out what my expectations should be with regards
    to testing at this point. Is KSE to the point that it's ready for
    performance testing or is stability still a concern?

    tia, -sc

    -- 
    Sean Chittenden
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Gianmarco Giovannelli: "Re: Minimalist FreeBSD 4.8"

    Relevant Pages

    • Call for thread testers
      ... stability of our new threading packages. ... and desktop packages to the test. ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: Call for thread testers
      ... Scott Long wrote: ... > stability of our new threading packages. ... > and desktop packages to the test. ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: Release statusus
      ... > Hi Colin, ... > while the testing release's stability will increase untill it's ... different package and you must manually choose to install them. ... Please get used to how packages are named. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Nvidia sucks, sucks, sucks !
      ... You probably should consider ubuntu or RHEL which are much more stable in general. ... You do trade off having the "latest and greatest" packages for ... the stability of time tested but slightly older versions. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Novell Needs To Tighten Up on Configuration
      ... it you want stability and customization for suse, use their packages. ...
      (alt.os.linux.suse)