Re: [PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c

From: Daniel Eischen (eischen_at_vigrid.com)
Date: 09/29/03

  • Next message: Dan Langille: "Re: [PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c" 
    Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:02:18 -0400 (EDT)
To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>

    On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote:

    > On 18 Sep 2003 at 7:50, Daniel Eischen wrote:
    >
    > >
    > > Right, this seems correct to me.
    >
    > All our testing on this patch has been successful. I'm going to do a
    > few more tests on different hardware under 4.8-stable.
    >
    > What's the next step? Commit it? Get others to test with it first?

    Sure, it looks good enough to commit.

    > >
    > > > The problem found when running under pthreads on 4.8-stable [i.e.
    > > > EOT is not returned to the application code] is not found with libkse
    > > > on 5.1-current.
    >
    > FWIW: our regression tests are failing under 5.1 and we suspect that
    > MTIOCERRSTAT ioctl() has changed since 4.8. We're getting:
    >
    > btape: dev.c:1119 Doing MTIOCERRSTAT errno=22 ERR=Invalid argument
    >
    > We'll continue with our 5.1 work, but we'd like to finish up with 4.8
    > ASAP.

    Well, I can commit it to -current first, then it can go into
    -stable. I'm not sure about the ioctl, though. 

    -- 
Dan Eischen
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Dan Langille: "Re: [PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c"