Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD
From: Q (q_dolan_at_yahoo.com.au)
Date: 10/23/03
- Previous message: Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev: "msdosfs & am-utils"
- In reply to: Andy: "Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD"
- Next in thread: Marc Olzheim: "Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD"
- Reply: Marc Olzheim: "Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD"
- Reply: Marc Olzheim: "Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Andy <andy-freebsd@splashground.de> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:55:21 +1000
I beg to differ. It might show linear growth, but the OpenBSD graph is
definitely not O(n).
Seeya...Q
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 21:23, Andy wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 09:36:48AM +1000, Q wrote:
> > This is interesting, and demonstrates what I have been seeing, however
> > OpenBSD obviously has other issues with it's mmap implementation
> > entirely separate from this discussion.
>
> Indeed, but also note the OpenBSD graph¹
> is actually two graphs, one O(n) and One O(1).
>
> aha
>
> ¹ http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/mmap.png
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev: "msdosfs & am-utils"
- In reply to: Andy: "Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD"
- Next in thread: Marc Olzheim: "Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD"
- Reply: Marc Olzheim: "Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD"
- Reply: Marc Olzheim: "Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|