Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD
From: Marc Olzheim (marcolz_at_stack.nl)
Date: 10/23/03
- Previous message: Marc Olzheim: "Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD"
- In reply to: Q: "Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD"
- Next in thread: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:13:53 +0200 To: Q <q_dolan@yahoo.com.au>
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 09:55:21PM +1000, Q wrote:
> I beg to differ. It might show linear growth, but the OpenBSD graph is
> definitely not O(n).
Hmm, it looks like that when it hits the next threshold, it's O(n),
but O(1) otherwise. But contrary to the blurry Linux 2.4 fork() graph,
the thresholds seem set at fixed numbers of pages.
Zlo
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Marc Olzheim: "Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD"
- In reply to: Q: "Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD"
- Next in thread: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]