Re: Size-independent byte order swapping functions.
From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek (nick_at_garage.freebsd.pl)
Date: 11/25/03
- Previous message: Mark Murray: "Re: Size-independent byte order swapping functions."
- In reply to: David Schultz: "Re: Size-independent byte order swapping functions."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:38:26 +0100 To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 05:13:08PM -0800, David Schultz wrote:
+> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
+> > If one is using strictly defined types as uint8_t, uint16_t, int32_t, etc.
+> > those macros are helpful IMHO, because futher value size changes does not
+> > affects code for byte order managing. This also does not hit perfromance,
+> > because this should be resolved at compile-time.
+>
+> Cool, looks useful.
+>
+> > I'm not sure if dedicated epanic() is the best way to implement out-of-range
+> > errors prevention - the more handy solution should cause compile error.
+>
+> See CTASSERT.
I've tried, but you can't use CTASSERT() inside (?:).
-- Pawel Jakub Dawidek pawel@dawidek.net UNIX Systems Programmer/Administrator http://garage.freebsd.pl Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://cerber.sourceforge.net
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Mark Murray: "Re: Size-independent byte order swapping functions."
- In reply to: David Schultz: "Re: Size-independent byte order swapping functions."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
