Re: Re: Zero copy sockets question
From: Andrew Gallatin (gallatin_at_cs.duke.edu)
Date: 02/12/04
- Previous message: Craig Boston: "Subversion/CVS experiment update"
- In reply to: Dung Patrick: "Re: Re: Zero copy sockets question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:29:24 -0500 (EST) To: Dung Patrick <dkt@digitalme.com>
Dung Patrick writes:
> Correct me if I am wrong:
>
> To use the zero copy 'receive' on i386, you need to set the MTU to 4096 bytes(page size) or 4096 multiples.
No, just larger than a page-size plus headers. FreeBSD's tcp
automagically sets the mss to a page-sized multiple for large MTUs.
And you need a nic which can do header splitting (ie, DMA the headers
and the payload to different places in the host).
> If it is true, until zero copy receive can do auto fitting, I think zero copy receive is more useful in gigabit ethernet than in fast ethernet (I assume MTU 1500(or smaller) is suitable for fast ethernet/Internet.)
Fast ethernet is slow enough, it doesn't really make sense there.
These days, one could argue that it really only makes sense for 10GbE.
Drew
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Craig Boston: "Subversion/CVS experiment update"
- In reply to: Dung Patrick: "Re: Re: Zero copy sockets question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]