Re: FAST_IPSEC bug fix
From: Sam Leffler (sam_at_errno.com)
Date: 04/24/04
- Previous message: Sam Leffler: "Re: FAST_IPSEC bug fix"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: FAST_IPSEC bug fix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:58:14 -0700 To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
On Apr 24, 2004, at 11:24 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> At 12:56 PM 24/04/2004, Sam Leffler wrote:
>> On Apr 24, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Oldach, Helge wrote:
>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> this is a month-old mail about the lack of a FAST_IPSEC feature
>>> compared
>>> to legacy IPSEC. Including a working patch. I haven't seen this being
>>> committed, or is it? Please also MFC to STABLE.
>>
>> The fix was not quite right for -current (where it needs to go in
>> first). I sent out the attached patch for testing but received no
>> feedback. Until I can get it tested and committed to -current it
>> won't be MFC'd.
>
> We dont run -current here, so I dont have anything to test it on.
> Also, due to the bugs in the driver with HiFn 7955, we have had to
> abandon FAST_IPSEC :(
Running FAST IPSEC w/o h/w crypto is still faster than KAME IPsec. See
the results in my BSDCon paper.
Sam
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Sam Leffler: "Re: FAST_IPSEC bug fix"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: FAST_IPSEC bug fix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|