Re: Interoperation of flock(2), fcntl(2), and lockf(3)

From: Yar Tikhiy (yar_at_comp.chem.msu.su)
Date: 05/18/04

  • Next message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: [PATCH/RFC] *BSD kernel debugging" 
    Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 03:28:27 +0400
To: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre-lists@9online.fr>

    On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 01:00:13PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
    > "Yar Tikhiy" <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> wrote:
    > [snip]
    > > Considering all the above, I'd like to add the following paragraph
    > > to the flock(2), lockf(3), and fcntl(2) man pages (replacing the
    > > sentence quoted from lockf(3)):
    > >
    > > The flock(2), fcntl(2), and lockf(3) locks are compatible.
    > > Processes using different locking interfaces can cooperate
    > > over the same file safely. However, only one of such
    > > interfaces should be used within a process. If a file is
    >
    > s/a process/the same process/ ?

    Agreed, thanks!

    BTW, since no objections were raised and Kirk encouraged me to make
    the change (thank you Kirk!), I just did so. 

    -- 
Yar
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: [PATCH/RFC] *BSD kernel debugging"

    Relevant Pages