simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?

From: Andrew Beals (bandy_at_cinnamon.com)
Date: 05/27/04

  • Next message: Brooks Davis: "Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?" 
    To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 15:34:15 -0700

    Why is there no default pop3 implementation included in the FreeBSD
    distribution? Is it for a lack of a suitably-licensed server, or does
    everyone believe APOP authentication is crackable? 

    -- 
More coffee!
http://cinnamon.com/~bandy/	 DoD#1005
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Brooks Davis: "Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?
      ... > Why is there no default pop3 implementation included in the FreeBSD ... Is it for a lack of a suitably-licensed server, ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?
      ... > Why is there no default pop3 implementation included in the FreeBSD ... Is it for a lack of a suitably-licensed server, ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?
      ... > Why is there no default pop3 implementation included in the FreeBSD ... Is it for a lack of a suitably-licensed server, ...
      (freebsd-net)
    • Fwd: Re: music on FreeBSD
      ... Subject: Re: music on FreeBSD ... for free distribution with the FreeBSD package? ... >> used for Commercial Purposses. ... However as per the BSD license you CAN ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Commercial Distribution?
      ... > based on FreeBSD makes more sense for us. ... > to our customers which installs our own customized FreeBSD environment, ... includes all of the dependencies to run your proprietary software. ... you include or remove from your particular distribution. ...
      (freebsd-questions)