Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?
From: Brooks Davis (brooks_at_one-eyed-alien.net)
Date: 05/27/04
- Previous message: Andrew Beals: "simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?"
- In reply to: Andrew Beals: "simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?"
- Next in thread: Anton Alin-Adrian: "Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:47:24 -0700 To: Andrew Beals <bandy@cinnamon.com>
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 03:34:15PM -0700, Andrew Beals wrote:
> Why is there no default pop3 implementation included in the FreeBSD
> distribution? Is it for a lack of a suitably-licensed server, or does
> everyone believe APOP authentication is crackable?
This isn't Linux. :-) POP servers are neither traditional BSD
software nor useful to the majority of FreeBSD systems so they live in
ports. There are quite a large number of them there in the mail
category.
-- Brooks
-- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Andrew Beals: "simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?"
- In reply to: Andrew Beals: "simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?"
- Next in thread: Anton Alin-Adrian: "Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
