Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?
From: Cyrille Lefevre (clefevre-lists_at_9online.fr)
Date: 05/27/04
- Previous message: lost inferno: "Re: KVA space problems?"
- In reply to: Chris Doherty: "Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <chris-freebsd@randomcamel.net>, <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 19:35:11 +0200
"Chris Doherty" <chris-freebsd@randomcamel.net> wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:57:17AM +0300, Anton Alin-Adrian said:
> > Andrew Beals wrote:
> > >Why is there no default pop3 implementation included in the FreeBSD
> > >distribution? Is it for a lack of a suitably-licensed server, or does
> > >everyone believe APOP authentication is crackable?
> >
> > Is there any for IMAP?
>
> cd /usr/ports/mail ; make search key=imap
>
> or
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/ports/mail.html
if you're using standard mbox format, dovecot is your freind and
is faster than imap-uw since they are indexes. it also known about
courier's maildir format and is really simple to configure.
http://monkey.org/openbsd/archive/misc/0405/msg00490.html
if you're using maildir mbox format, consider courier-imap or binc-imap.
if you're using virtual domains, courier-imap would be your friend.
Cyrille Lefevre.
-- home: mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: lost inferno: "Re: KVA space problems?"
- In reply to: Chris Doherty: "Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]