Re: hacking SCO....
From: Doug Russell (drussell_at_saturn-tech.com)
Date: 09/27/04
- Previous message: Doug Russell: "Re: hacking SCO...."
- In reply to: Doug Russell: "Re: hacking SCO...."
- Next in thread: John Von Essen: "Re: hacking SCO...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:25:09 -0600 (MDT) To: John Von Essen <john@essenz.com>
Oh, I love replying to my own posts.... :)
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Doug Russell wrote:
> Try adding conv=sync,noerror to your dd line. If most of the data
> after the defect(s) can be read, you'll end up with an almost complete
> partition which will likely run. You can then fsck and restore from tape.
>
> for example,
>
> dd if=/dev/daX of=/dev/daY conv=sync,noerror bs=128k
Actually, remove the bs=128k from above (force of habit). When you're
trying to recover a disk like this, you want the block size to be single
sectors (bs=512, the default) so you get every sector that is readable.
It's slower, but it'll get you a more complete copy if it only skips 1
sector on an error instead of 256. :)
If you know the defects are only in a certain range, you can get creative
with the skip directives to dd and copy most of the disk in larger
blocks, and go back and do the bad part one sector at a time (very handy
when recovering today's large IDE disks).
See the dd(1) manpage for more info.
Later...... <Doug>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Doug Russell: "Re: hacking SCO...."
- In reply to: Doug Russell: "Re: hacking SCO...."
- Next in thread: John Von Essen: "Re: hacking SCO...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|