Re: Why present different size and md5 hash between the compiled code and FreeBSD's build-in binary ?
From: Andreas Kohn (andreas.kohn_at_gmx.net)
Date: 10/12/04
- Previous message: Jerry: "Why present different size and md5 hash between the compiled code and FreeBSD's build-in binary ?"
- In reply to: Jerry: "Why present different size and md5 hash between the compiled code and FreeBSD's build-in binary ?"
- Next in thread: Andreas Kohn: "Re: Why present different size and md5 hash between the compiled code and FreeBSD's build-in binary ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:44:39 +0200 To: Jerry <cuoching@yahoo.com.tw>
Jerry wrote:
>Hi~
>
>This is my first time to post question here, and also
>I am a newbie on FreeBSD. A confusing thing I discover
>is: Why the binary code I compiled(for example,telnet
>command)compare with the original one is diffirent,
>either size or md5 hash value, What's going on? Are
>the source files differ from the FreeBSD's binary, or
>something else ?
>Deeply appreciate your reply, thanks ~
>
>Jerry Chang
>
>
>
Hi,
you might be using different optimization flags than the release
building cluster.
Also make sure that you have really the correct sources, and not a newer
version from CVS.
HTH,
-- Andreas _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Jerry: "Why present different size and md5 hash between the compiled code and FreeBSD's build-in binary ?"
- In reply to: Jerry: "Why present different size and md5 hash between the compiled code and FreeBSD's build-in binary ?"
- Next in thread: Andreas Kohn: "Re: Why present different size and md5 hash between the compiled code and FreeBSD's build-in binary ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]