RE: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports?
From: Kang Liu (liukang_at_bjpu.edu.cn)
Date: 01/25/05
- Previous message: Evgeny Dolgopiat: "New failure detection algorithm for ng_one2many"
- Next in thread: Avleen Vig: "Re: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports?"
- Reply: Avleen Vig: "Re: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports?"
- Maybe reply: Kang Liu: "RE: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <delphij@delphij.net>, <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:24:57 +0800
Delphij,
I think the base should be as *clean* as possible, it might be
better if we put nc into ports. :P
Regards,
Kang
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Evgeny Dolgopiat: "New failure detection algorithm for ng_one2many"
- Next in thread: Avleen Vig: "Re: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports?"
- Reply: Avleen Vig: "Re: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports?"
- Maybe reply: Kang Liu: "RE: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
