Re: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports?
From: Bruce M Simpson (bms_at_spc.org)
Date: 01/26/05
- Previous message: Yan Yu: "Re: seg fault on kse_release () (fwd)"
- In reply to: Coleman Kane: "Re: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports?"
- Next in thread: M. Warner Losh: "Re: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports?"
- Reply: M. Warner Losh: "Re: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:29:36 +0000 To: cokane@cokane.org
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:46:30PM -0500, Coleman Kane wrote:
> This is only my personal opinion. I think the WITH_XXXX_OVERWITE_BASE
> make options help substantiate it, however.
I've recently updated the tcpdump port to fix a number of issues. If
people could confirm that the OVERWRITE_BASE option still works there,
I should be most grateful.
Regards,
BMS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Yan Yu: "Re: seg fault on kse_release () (fwd)"
- In reply to: Coleman Kane: "Re: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports?"
- Next in thread: M. Warner Losh: "Re: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports?"
- Reply: M. Warner Losh: "Re: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]