Re: the best form to wait the finish of execution of a child...
From: Florent Thoumie (flz_at_xbsd.org)
Date: 03/30/05
- Previous message: Michael C. Shultz: "Re: the best form to wait the finish of execution of a child..."
- In reply to: zean zean: "the best form to wait the finish of execution of a child..."
- Next in thread: zean zean: "Re: the best form to wait the finish of execution of a child..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: zean zean <fbsd.hackers@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:28:29 +0200
Le Mercredi 30 mars 2005 à 14:17 -0400, zean zean a écrit :
> Hi Hackers:
>
> Excuse for my badly English. which is the best form to wait the
> finish of execution of a child.
It depends on the context of your program
(synchronous/asynchronous).
> My idea is:
>
> pid_t chilpid;
>
> while(childpid != wait(&status))
> ;
That's a possibility, you can catch SIGCHLD with a signal
handler (see signal(3), sigprocmask(2), sigaction(2)) which
would set a global flag, and then use a non-blocking waitpid(2)
or wait4(2) instead.
Note: What you suggested isn't really safe. You shouldn't
ignore wait(2) return status (could be -1 because something
unexpected happened, see ERRORS section from the manpage).
-- Florent Thoumie flz@xbsd.org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: Michael C. Shultz: "Re: the best form to wait the finish of execution of a child..."
- In reply to: zean zean: "the best form to wait the finish of execution of a child..."
- Next in thread: zean zean: "Re: the best form to wait the finish of execution of a child..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|