Re: ffsrecov still broken port?
From: Daniel O'Connor (doconnor_at_gsoft.com.au)
Date: 05/29/05
- Previous message: Christoph P. Kukulies: "Re: ffsrecov still broken port?"
- In reply to: Christoph P. Kukulies: "Re: ffsrecov still broken port?"
- Next in thread: Christoph P. Kukulies: "Re: ffsrecov still broken port?"
- Reply: Christoph P. Kukulies: "Re: ffsrecov still broken port?"
- Reply: Christoph P. Kukulies: "Re: ffsrecov still broken port?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "Christoph P. Kukulies" <kuku@kukulies.org> Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 20:23:51 +0930
On Sun, 29 May 2005 19:07, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
> > What "obvious" reasons?
>
> I meant, when I have a dump image of the entire disk I cannot
> run fsck on the entire dump. I had to know about the partitions
> and the slices and extract these from the disk dump.
You can't specify /dev/md0s2a or whatever to fsck/mount?
-- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Christoph P. Kukulies: "Re: ffsrecov still broken port?"
- In reply to: Christoph P. Kukulies: "Re: ffsrecov still broken port?"
- Next in thread: Christoph P. Kukulies: "Re: ffsrecov still broken port?"
- Reply: Christoph P. Kukulies: "Re: ffsrecov still broken port?"
- Reply: Christoph P. Kukulies: "Re: ffsrecov still broken port?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|