Re: "Smart" Hubs
From: Brooks Davis (brooks_at_one-eyed-alien.net)
Date: 09/09/05
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: 6.0-BETA4 package install failures"
- In reply to: Andrea Campi: "Re: "Smart" Hubs"
- Next in thread: Daniel Eischen: "Re: "Smart" Hubs"
- Reply: Daniel Eischen: "Re: "Smart" Hubs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 11:18:41 -0700 To: Andrea Campi <andrea+freebsd_hackers@webcom.it>
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:48:41PM +0200, Andrea Campi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:39:30AM -0600, Ryan P. Sommers wrote:
> > Hub in question is a linksys NH1005 v2.
> >
> > PS If anyone knows of a hub that's "easy" to find and still is an actuall
> > good 'ol hub, let me know.
>
> Linksys is sort of well known for playing this trick: they call entry
> level switches "hub" and reserve "switch" for higher-level equipment.
> Which is fine for people who just have to check email and play Quake, but
> screws you to no end when you actually need a hub :-/
>
> Google will tell you more about this, as well as suggesting real hubs.
> I'd recommend to go with Netgear.
Alternativly, if you can get your hands on a second ethernet port for
your sniffer box, make a passive tap:
http://www.snort.org/docs/tap/
-- Brooks
-- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: 6.0-BETA4 package install failures"
- In reply to: Andrea Campi: "Re: "Smart" Hubs"
- Next in thread: Daniel Eischen: "Re: "Smart" Hubs"
- Reply: Daniel Eischen: "Re: "Smart" Hubs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|