Re: using fast interrupts with em(4)
From: M. Warner Losh (imp_at_bsdimp.com)
Date: 09/30/05
- Previous message: Khaled: "arplookup/arpresolved failure messages in mailserver"
- In reply to: Kernel Dev: "using fast interrupts with em(4)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 10:31:18 -0600 (MDT) To: kerndev@yahoo.com
In message: <20050930010434.67727.qmail@web35003.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Kernel Dev <kerndev@yahoo.com> writes:
: Hello All. For a project, I am looking into making the em(4) driver use fast interrupts. Has someone done this or are there other driver references that could help me in this?
:
: I understand that the main problems are:
:
: 1. Sharing of interrupts.
: 2. Blocking (memory and mutexes).
:
: Are there any other issues I might have missed?
You can share fast interrupts, but it isn't a good idea...
You can't block in a fast interrupt. You must use spin locks. You
cannot call anything that will sleep in a fast interrupt. Ideally,
you'd not modify anything that isn't covered by your own spin locks,
leaving that for a taskqueue or similar queueing strategy.
Warner
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Khaled: "arplookup/arpresolved failure messages in mailserver"
- In reply to: Kernel Dev: "using fast interrupts with em(4)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]