Re: correct use of bus_dmamap_sync
From: Dinesh Nair (dinesh_at_alphaque.com)
Date: 10/27/05
- Previous message: Daniel Rudy: "Re: devinfo(3) problem..."
- In reply to: Scott Long: "Re: correct use of bus_dmamap_sync"
- Next in thread: Scott Long: "Re: correct use of bus_dmamap_sync"
- Reply: Scott Long: "Re: correct use of bus_dmamap_sync"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:47:59 +0800 To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
On 10/27/05 04:16 Scott Long said the following:
>>> an example would be using (BUS_DMASYNC_POSTREAD|BUS_DMASYNC_PREWRITE)
>>> which
>>> would be 0x03 in freebsd 4.x and 0x06 in freebsd 5.x. the gotcha is that
>>> 0x03 in freebsd 4.x is BUS_DMASYNC_POSTWRITE. so therefore,
>>> BUS_DMASYNC_POSTREAD|BUS_DMASYNC_PREWRITE will be
>>> BUS_DMASYNC_POSTWRITE in
>>> 4.x which in the syscall is actually a no op.
>>
>> Yes, that is fugly. Just don't use the | versions for now I would guess.
>
> Trying to maintain source compatibility between 4.x and 5.x/6.x will
> make you encounter a whole lot more problems than just this.
could you elaborate on what busdma related problems there'd be, between 4.x
and 5.x/6.x ? do, for example, the inner workings of the bus_dma* syscalls
work the same on both ?
-- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Daniel Rudy: "Re: devinfo(3) problem..."
- In reply to: Scott Long: "Re: correct use of bus_dmamap_sync"
- Next in thread: Scott Long: "Re: correct use of bus_dmamap_sync"
- Reply: Scott Long: "Re: correct use of bus_dmamap_sync"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|