Re: Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- From: des@xxxxxx (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 17:57:14 +0100
John Baldwin <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I don't think you should change TORTIOUS to TORTUOUS in the license. Reading
> license disclaimers may indeed be tortuous, but tortious is an actual legal
> term, not a misspelling. It comes from the root word 'tort' which is a legal
> word for 'sue' (basically).
Uh, no. It's a legal word for "harm", "damage" or "injury".
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@xxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- From: John Baldwin
- Re: Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- References:
- Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- From: Ceri Davies
- Re: Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- From: John Baldwin
- Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- Prev by Date: Re: My wish list for 6.1
- Next by Date: Re: Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- Previous by thread: Re: Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- Next by thread: Re: Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- Index(es):