Re: Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- From: John Baldwin <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:56:44 -0500
On Friday 23 December 2005 05:43 am, Ceri Davies wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:18:26AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > Sounds good (you could just go back to using -static in that case, but
> > that's a minor detail). Still have TORTUOUS change in your diff. :)
>
> No harm done :)
>
> New version fixing both issues at
> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ceri/crunchgen.so.diff
>
> Ceri
Commit! :)
--
John Baldwin <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxx> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- From: Ceri Davies
- Re: Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- References:
- Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- From: Ceri Davies
- Re: Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- From: John Baldwin
- Re: Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- From: Ceri Davies
- Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- Prev by Date: Re: Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- Next by Date: Re: 2 lame questions (ipfw, keyboard driver)
- Previous by thread: Re: Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- Next by thread: Re: Mostly static binaries with crunchgen
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|