Re: repeatedly opening the same .so(s) is slow?
- From: joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:43:05 +0100
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 05:07:29AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Tue, 2006-Mar-21 14:31:24 +0100, joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Set libltdl_cv_sys_dlopen_deplibs=yes in the environment before running
configure and try again. And yes, this is *exactly* the same
idiosyncraty as KDE.
This is needed for both guile and libltdl. After replacing libltdl
and libguile-ltdl, gnucash startup has dropped from 15 minutes to 10
seconds. Thanks for the pointer. The correct fix would be to patch
the configure script so it recognizes FreeBSD. I'll file a PR this
evening (if no-one has fixed it by then).
If you report it upstream, please ask them to either drop this check or
write an actual test case. I don't even know a platform where it is
broken, so hurting platforms where no developers is using it just sucks
:-)
Joerg
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- repeatedly opening the same .so(s) is slow?
- From: Eric Schuele
- Re: repeatedly opening the same .so(s) is slow?
- From: joerg
- Re: repeatedly opening the same .so(s) is slow?
- From: Peter Jeremy
- Re: repeatedly opening the same .so(s) is slow?
- From: joerg
- Re: repeatedly opening the same .so(s) is slow?
- From: Peter Jeremy
- repeatedly opening the same .so(s) is slow?
- Prev by Date: Re: repeatedly opening the same .so(s) is slow?
- Next by Date: Re: repeatedly opening the same .so(s) is slow?
- Previous by thread: Re: repeatedly opening the same .so(s) is slow?
- Next by thread: Re: repeatedly opening the same .so(s) is slow?
- Index(es):