Re: Server choice.
- From: Eric Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:08:42 -0500
Paul Halliday wrote:
Hi,
I am in the process of building a new database server and after
pricing up 2 Dell models I thought I would throw this out just to see
which choice would be better suited for FreeBSD.
The demands on the system will be mostly network -> disk I/O with a
hope of best performance on quickly servicing numerous reads; for
example when reports are generated using the data in the database.
The 2 choices (we dont have that much money and they have to be Dell)
are a poweredge 1850 and a poweredge 850.
850 specs.
----------------
Procsesor: Pentium(Dual Core) 830 @ 3.0GHz/2X1MB Cache 800MHz FSB
Memory: 2GB DDR2, 533MHz (2x1GB) Dual ranked DIMMs
Disks: SATA
1850 specs.
------------------
Processors: 2 @ Xeon @ 3.0GHz/2MB Cache 800MHz FSB
Memory: 2GB DDR2, 400MHz (4x512) Single ranked DIMMs
Disks: Ultra 320
The pricing is really close.
I'm not sure the type of memory<->cpu utilization that mysql will do, however I can tell you that in a number of applications that do lots of cpu cache utilization, the 2x Xeon will knock over the dual-core.
I'd go with the 1850 (we have stacks of these in house).
Eric
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Server choice.
- From: Paul Halliday
- Server choice.
- Prev by Date: Server choice.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC
- Previous by thread: Server choice.
- Next by thread: Re: Server choice.
- Index(es):