Re: FreeBSD 6.1, crashes and a lack of vmcores

From: Matt Ruzicka <matt@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 12:56:35 -0600 (MDT)

On Fri, 26 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:

Try with 4BSD; ULE is known to be broken, and it's also usually a
performance loss except under minor load.

Cool, I'll jump back to 4BSD for completeness, though we were seeing the same behavior for a while before I tried ULE.

Thanks for the input.

Matt Ruzicka - Senior Systems Administrator
Front Range Internet, Inc.
matt@xxxxxxxx - (970) 212-0728

_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FreeBSD 6.1, crashes and a lack of vmcores
  - From: Kris Kennaway

References:
- FreeBSD 6.1, crashes and a lack of vmcores
  - From: Matt Ruzicka
- Re: FreeBSD 6.1, crashes and a lack of vmcores
  - From: Kris Kennaway

Prev by Date: Re: FreeBSD 6.1, crashes and a lack of vmcores
Next by Date: Re: FreeBSD 6.1, crashes and a lack of vmcores
Previous by thread: Re: FreeBSD 6.1, crashes and a lack of vmcores
Next by thread: Re: FreeBSD 6.1, crashes and a lack of vmcores
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread