Re: [RFC][patch] dhclient Classless Static Routes support
- From: Brooks Davis <brooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:26:12 -0700
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 01:12:22PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Hi!
I have implemented RFC3442 support for the FreeBSD dhclient.
Patch can be fetched from
http://butcher.heavennet.ru/patches/other/dhclient/
I have a small bit of testing with isc-dhcpd and dnsmasqd.
And i think it works fine. I have tested with:
1) Normal classless routes: 10.0.0.0/21 router, 10.1.0.0/19 router
2) default route
3) link routes: 192.168.0.0/24 0.0.0.0, 192.168.1.0/24 0.0.0.0
I don't know what i should make with incorrect data received from DHCP server..
At a glance I don't see any major issues. I won't have time to do
anything more with it for at least a couple weeks. I'd suggest filing
a PR with it to ensure it isn't lost. Ed, if you're interested in it,
feel free to commit.
The one thing I might worry about is that implementing classless static
routes means you have to ignore the default route and I'm a little
worried there might broken servers out there that spew bogus ones.
There's probably not way to find out other than shipping a release
though. :(
-- Brooks
--
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
Attachment:
pgpvfWg9QTNX4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][patch] dhclient Classless Static Routes support
- From: Ed Maste
- Re: [RFC][patch] dhclient Classless Static Routes support
- References:
- [RFC][patch] dhclient Classless Static Routes support
- From: Andrey V. Elsukov
- [RFC][patch] dhclient Classless Static Routes support
- Prev by Date: openospfd doesn't "See" gre/gif
- Next by Date: MIT kerberos and ssh
- Previous by thread: [RFC][patch] dhclient Classless Static Routes support
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][patch] dhclient Classless Static Routes support
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
