Re: A New FreeBSD Server
- From: Mike Meyer <mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers2.e313df@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 10:10:28 -0400
In <20060626111208.P77513@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@xxxxxxxx> typed:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Mike Meyer wrote:
MM> The other constraint on swap is that if you want the system to save a
MM> core dump if it panics, you need a device to dump on that's 64Kb
MM> bigger than ram. That's one device, not all of swap.
This is not quite true, as there always are some unused memory regions, hence
you need not add 64k to RAM size. At least, I had no trouble using swap == RAM
for last 5 years or so...
Or memory areas that aren't needed when doing the post mortem. The
question is, how do you guarantee that those are what's not going to
make it out to the dump device?
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <mwm@xxxxxxxxx> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A New FreeBSD Server
- From: Ed Maste
- Re: A New FreeBSD Server
- References:
- A New FreeBSD Server
- From: Bob Richards
- Re: A New FreeBSD Server
- From: Mike Meyer
- Re: A New FreeBSD Server
- From: Dmitry Morozovsky
- A New FreeBSD Server
- Prev by Date: Re: A New FreeBSD Server
- Next by Date: ENOMEM @ RELENG_6 graid3
- Previous by thread: Re: A New FreeBSD Server
- Next by thread: Re: A New FreeBSD Server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|