Re: FLEX, was Re: Return value of malloc(0)
- From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:04:26 +1000
On Wed, 2006-Jun-28 22:40:45 -0700, Randall Hyde wrote:
I seriously doubt seeing the code will do much good.
Here's the offending line:
YY_INPUT( (&yy_current_buffer->yy_ch_buf[number_to_move]),
yy_n_chars, num_to_read );
How about feeding the C source through the preprocessor, stripping out
the #line directives, compiling it and posting the exact gcc error and
source context.
It may be a gcc bug, it may be a HLA bug or it could be an interaction
between the FreeBSD headers and HLA.
--
Peter Jeremy
Attachment:
pgp6d4BdnVHAf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Return value of malloc(0)
- From: Andre Albsmeier
- Re: Return value of malloc(0)
- From: Lowell Gilbert
- Re: Return value of malloc(0)
- From: Randall Hyde
- Re: Return value of malloc(0)
- From: Steve Kargl
- FLEX, was Re: Return value of malloc(0)
- From: Randall Hyde
- Return value of malloc(0)
- Prev by Date: Re: FLEX, was Re: Return value of malloc(0)
- Next by Date: Re: FLEX, was Re: Return value of malloc(0)
- Previous by thread: Re: FLEX, was Re: Return value of malloc(0)
- Next by thread: Re: FLEX, was Re: Return value of malloc(0)
- Index(es):