freebsd-hackers
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: VM question related to faults
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: absolute vs. relative offsets in disklabel
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- absolute vs. relative offsets in disklabel
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: VM question related to faults
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: _getlogin()
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- _getlogin()
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: VM question related to faults
- Re: VM question related to faults
- Re: VM question related to faults
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: VM question related to faults
- Re: VM question related to faults
- Re: i386 page fault clobbers error code in trap frame
- Re: i386 page fault clobbers error code in trap frame
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: i386 page fault clobbers error code in trap frame
- Re: VM question related to faults
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: VM question related to faults
- VM question related to faults
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: fdescfs functional in 6.1?
- Re: fdescfs functional in 6.1?
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: i386 page fault clobbers error code in trap frame
- i386 page fault clobbers error code in trap frame
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: fdescfs functional in 6.1?
- Re: fdescfs functional in 6.1?
- fdescfs functional in 6.1?
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: FBSD 5.5 and software timers
- Re: New Welcome message for FreeBSD
- Re: FBSD 5.5 and software timers
- Re: How to Use ddb(4)?
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: How to Use ddb(4)?
- Re: FBSD 5.5 and software timers
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: How to Use ddb(4)?
- Re: cvs commit: www/en/projects/ideas index.sgml
- From: Alexander Leidinger
- Re: cvs commit: www/en/projects/ideas index.sgml
- From: Alexander Leidinger
- RE: FBSD 5.5 and software timers
- Re: cvs commit: www/en/projects/ideas index.sgml
- Re: How to Use ddb(4)?
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: Any success with bacula and DVD
- Re: Programs not accepting input?
- Re: FBSD 5.5 and software timers
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Any success with bacula and DVD
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: How to Use ddb(4)?
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: How to Use ddb(4)?
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: How to Use ddb(4)?
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: How to Use ddb(4)?
- From: Hans Petter Selasky
- Re: How to Use ddb(4)?
- Re: How to Use ddb(4)?
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: A bug in semctl()
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: Building a sandboxed kernel
- Re: A bug in semctl()
- Re: A question about ipcperm() call?
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- RE: puc question
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: A bug in semctl()
- Re: How to Use ddb(4)?
- Warning Message from uma_zdestroy(9)
- Re: How to Use ddb(4)?
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: How to Use ddb(4)?
- Re: Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Need some articles on routing sockets in FreeBSD
- Re: How to Use ddb(4)?
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- How to Use ddb(4)?
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Re: sys/dev/em/if_em.c
- Re: kqueue doesn't see if_tun
- Re: sys/dev/em/if_em.c
- sys/dev/em/if_em.c
- puc question
- Re: A bug in semctl()
- Re: A bug in semctl()
- A bug in semctl()
- Re: Rebooting jails
- FBSD 5.5 broke nanosleep in libc_r
- Re: [Fwd: Interrupts question]
- Re: [Fwd: Interrupts question]
- Re: FBSD 5.5 and software timers
- Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC
- Re: FBSD 5.5 and software timers
- Re: FBSD 5.5 and software timers
- Re: FBSD 5.5 and software timers
- Re: FBSD 5.5 and software timers
- RE: FBSD 5.5 and software timers
- RE: FBSD 5.5 and software timers
- Re: kqueue doesn't see if_tun
- From: Alexander Leidinger
- Re: FBSD 5.5 and software timers
- Re: Just a question
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Re: Just a question
- Just a question
- Re: Failing `make buildworld` with today's source
- Re: kqueue doesn't see if_tun
- Re: FBSD 5.5 and software timers
- kqueue doesn't see if_tun
- Re: [emulation] WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Rebooting jails
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Re: [emulation] WINE vs. FreeBSD
- FBSD 5.5 and software timers
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Re: A question about ipcperm() call?
- From: Alexander Leidinger
- Re: A question about ipcperm() call?
- Re: A question about ipcperm() call?
- Re: Programs not accepting input?
- Re: Failing `make buildworld` with today's source
- Re: i386 registers during a syscall
- Re: i386 registers during a syscall
- Re: A question about ipcperm() call?
- Re: A question about ipcperm() call?
- Re: i386 registers during a syscall
- A question about ipcperm() call?
- Re: Platform dependent locations
- Re: i386 registers during a syscall
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Platform dependent locations (was Re: Building a sandboxed kernel)
- Re: New Welcome message for FreeBSD
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Re: Building a sandboxed kernel
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Re: New Welcome message for FreeBSD
- i386 registers during a syscall
- Re: Building a sandboxed kernel
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: Building a sandboxed kernel
- Re: Machine-dependent code extension?
- Re: Building a sandboxed kernel
- An error about IPC permission checking
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Machine-dependent code extension?
- Building a sandboxed kernel
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Re: Programs not accepting input?
- From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey
- Re: Re: Programs not accepting input?
- From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Re: open ("/dev/lpt0" ...) hangup solved
- WINE vs. FreeBSD
- open ("/dev/lpt0" ...) hangup solved
- Re: FreeBSD 6.0/6.1: open ("/dev/lpt0" ...) hangs up
- Re: FreeBSD 6.0/6.1: open ("/dev/lpt0" ...) hangs up
- Re: FreeBSD 6.0/6.1: open ("/dev/lpt0" ...) hangs up
- From: Hans Petter Selasky
- Re: FreeBSD 6.0/6.1: open ("/dev/lpt0" ...) hangs up
- FreeBSD 6.0/6.1: open ("/dev/lpt0" ...) hangs up
- Re: New Welcome message for FreeBSD
- Re: New Welcome message for FreeBSD
- Re: "swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU
- Re: "swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU
- Re: New Welcome message for FreeBSD
- Re: "swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: Programs not accepting input?
- Re: Re: Programs not accepting input?
- Re: New Welcome message for FreeBSD
- Re: Re: Programs not accepting input?
- From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey
- Re: Programs not accepting input?
- From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey
- Re: Improving FreeBSD's hardware compatibility
- New Welcome message for FreeBSD
- Re: Re: Re: Programs not accepting input?
- Re: Improving FreeBSD's hardware compatibility
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: Improving FreeBSD's hardware compatibility
- Re: Re: Programs not accepting input?
- Re: [Fwd: Interrupts question]
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: Improving FreeBSD's hardware compatibility
- Re: Re: Programs not accepting input?
- Re: Programs not accepting input?
- RE: [Fwd: Interrupts question]
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: VIA padlock performance
- Re: "swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU
- Re: "swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU
- Re: On the use of Tun interfaces.
- Re: VIA padlock performance
- From: Michael Reifenberger
- more if_tun frustration.
- Re: VIA padlock performance
- Re: VIA padlock performance
- Re: VIA padlock performance
- From: Michael Reifenberger
- Re: VIA padlock performance
- From: Michael Reifenberger
- Re: VIA padlock performance
- Re: "swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU
- Re: VIA padlock performance
- Re: [Fwd: Interrupts question]
- Re: VIA padlock performance
- Re: [Fwd: Interrupts question]
- sshd throwing signal 6 (sigabrt)
- Re: odd behavior in apache 2.0.58 today
- Re: "swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU
- Re: odd behavior in apache 2.0.58 today
- Re: odd behavior in apache 2.0.58 today
- odd behavior in apache 2.0.58 today
- Re: "swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU
- Re: On the use of Tun interfaces.
- Re: "swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU
- Re: On the use of Tun interfaces.
- Re: VIA padlock performance
- Re: [Fwd: Interrupts question]
- VIA padlock performance
- From: Michael Reifenberger
- "swiN: clock sio" process taking 75% CPU
- Re: [RFT]: InFlight Mode Patch
- From: Alexander Leidinger
- Re: [RFT]: InFlight Mode Patch
- On the use of Tun interfaces.
- Re: [RFT]: InFlight Mode Patch
- Re: [Fwd: Interrupts question]
- Re: [Fwd: Interrupts question]
- Re: [Fwd: Interrupts question]
- Re: automatic KSE for multithreaded programs
- automatic KSE for multithreaded programs
- [Fwd: Interrupts question]
- [RFT]: InFlight Mode Patch
- Re: dlsym() on implicit loaded symbols
- Re: Error Api OpenLdap
- Re: LinkLib Issues In freebsd Lazarus
- Re: LinkLib Issues In freebsd Lazarus
- Re: LinkLib Issues In freebsd Lazarus
- Error Api OpenLdap
- Re: LinkLib Issues In freebsd Lazarus
- Re: LinkLib Issues In freebsd Lazarus
- Re: LinkLib Issues In freebsd Lazarus
- LinkLib Issues In freebsd Lazarus
- Re: dlsym() on implicit loaded symbols
- Re: dlsym() on implicit loaded symbols
- From: Simon 'corecode' Schubert
- Re: dlsym() on implicit loaded symbols
- Re: BSD tar broken file name parsing
- Re: linux gdb doesnt work at all, fbsd one with problems
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: fork inside ip_input
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: dlsym() on implicit loaded symbols
- From: Simon 'corecode' Schubert
- linux gdb doesnt work at all, fbsd one with problems
- Genius slimstar pro keyboard
- Re: Sysinstall: Write the FreeBSD version at the top of the display
- dlsym() on implicit loaded symbols
- Re: fork inside ip_input
- Re: fork inside ip_input
- From: Simon 'corecode' Schubert
- Re: fork inside ip_input
- fork inside ip_input
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-16 release, it is ready for the merge
- Re: [SoC]: question about execve()
- [ANN] unionfs patchset-16 release, it is ready for the merge
- [SoC]: question about execve()
- Re: Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: Sysinstall: Write the FreeBSD version at the top of the display
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- tim's talk starting now.
- Re: Sysinstall: Write the FreeBSD version at the top of the display
- Sysinstall: Write the FreeBSD version at the top of the display
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- From: Alexander Leidinger
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- improving drivers (was: Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++)
- From: Alexander Leidinger
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: /boot/boot, where?
- Re: /boot/boot, where?
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- /boot/boot, where?
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- FreeBSD Status Report Second Quarter 2006
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: Intel Vanderpool (VT) on FreeBSD or FreeBSD Xen
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Intel Vanderpool (VT) on FreeBSD or FreeBSD Xen
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: Stop further socket() or connect() calls.
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: gdb able to debug both fbsd and linux binaries
- From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: FreeBSD MIDI support
- Re: File Mirror Software
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: kern/99979: Get Ready for Kernel Module in C++
- Re: FreeBSD MIDI support
- From: Alexander Leidinger
- Re: gdb able to debug both fbsd and linux binaries
- RE: FreeBSD MIDI support
- File Mirror Software
- Re: 6.1 kernel panic
- FreeBSD MIDI support
- Re: 6.1 kernel panic
- Re: 6.1 kernel panic
- Re: gdb able to debug both fbsd and linux binaries
- Re: SATA300 Controllers
- gdb able to debug both fbsd and linux binaries
- Re: 6.1 kernel panic
- Inconsistent snapshots?
- From: Stephen J. Roznowski
- Re: 6.1 kernel panic
- 6.1 kernel panic
- Re: BSD tar broken file name parsing
- Re: Call for Status Reports: 07/07
- Re: Static built binaries having unknown ELF binary types
- Re: Static built binaries having unknown ELF binary types
- Static built binaries having unknown ELF binary types
- From: Victor Roman Archidona
- Re: Promise PDC20267 / ide bug?
- Promise PDC20267 / ide bug?
- BSD tar broken file name parsing
- Re: SATA300 Controllers
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: SATA300 Controllers
- Re: SATA300 Controllers
- Re: SATA300 Controllers
- Re: SATA300 Controllers
- Re: SATA300 Controllers
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: SATA300 Controllers
- Re: SATA300 Controllers
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: SATA300 Controllers
- Re: SATA300 Controllers
- SATA300 Controllers
- From: Derrick T. Woolworth
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: getc in BSD (was FLEX issues)
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: Return value of malloc(0)
- Re: Stop further socket() or connect() calls.
- Re: Stop further socket() or connect() calls.
- From: Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN]
- Re: assyms.s
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: vop_stratgey name
- Re: Stop further socket() or connect() calls.
- Re: getc in BSD (was FLEX issues)
- Re: assyms.s
- vop_stratgey name
- assyms.s
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: getc in BSD (was FLEX issues)
- Re: getc in BSD (was FLEX issues)
- Re: getc in BSD (was FLEX issues)
- Re: Stop further socket() or connect() calls.
- getc in BSD (was FLEX issues)
- Stop further socket() or connect() calls.
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- [patch] display jail id in /usr/bin/top
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: contiguous memory allocation problem
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: contiguous memory allocation problem
- Re: contiguous memory allocation problem
- From: Hans Petter Selasky
- Re: contiguous memory allocation problem
- Re: contiguous memory allocation problem
- Re: contiguous memory allocation problem
- Re: Return value of malloc(0)
- Re: Return value of malloc(0)
- Re: contiguous memory allocation problem
- Re: contiguous memory allocation problem
- From: Hans Petter Selasky
- Re: contiguous memory allocation problem
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: contiguous memory allocation problem
- From: Hans Petter Selasky
- Re: Alternative compiler toolchain ?
- From: Alexander Leidinger
- Re: contiguous memory allocation problem
- Re: Alternative compiler toolchain ?
- Re: Alternative compiler toolchain ?
- Re: Alternative compiler toolchain ?
- Re: Alternative compiler toolchain ?
- Re: Alternative compiler toolchain ?
- Re: Alternative compiler toolchain ?
- Re: Alternative compiler toolchain ?
- Re: High-speed transfers
- From: Hans Petter Selasky
- High-speed transfers
- Re: contiguous memory allocation problem
- Re: Alternative compiler toolchain ?
- Re: contiguous memory allocation problem
- From: Hans Petter Selasky
- Re: Alternative compiler toolchain ?
- Re: Alternative compiler toolchain ?
- From: Alexander Leidinger
- Re: Return value of malloc(0)
- Re: contiguous memory allocation problem
- From: Hans Petter Selasky
- Re: Alternative compiler toolchain ?
- Re: freebsd port onto IBM/Lenovo T 40
- Re: Alternative compiler toolchain ?
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Re: Alternative compiler toolchain ?
- Re: Alternative compiler toolchain ?
- Re: NVIDIA FreeBSD kernel feature requests
- Alternative compiler toolchain ?
