Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 23:11:38 +0200
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 10:25:28PM +0200, Andreas Klemm wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 02:21:59PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 08:39:37AM +0200, Andreas Klemm wrote:
Later I wanted to mount the dfly filesystems on FreeBSD 6.1,
of course still my main Unix ;-) But it wasn't possible.
DragonFly disklabels allow 16 entries by default, FreeBSD still limits
it to 8. That's why you can't read it directly.
Hmm, for the sake of compatibility, wouldn't it have been an option,
to add this extra bit to the end of the struct ?
The layout of the struct has not changed. FreeBSD simply rejects the
disk label because the number of entries is too large.
Joerg
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Andreas Klemm
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Andreas Klemm
- disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Prev by Date: Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'
- Previous by thread: Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Next by thread: Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|