Re: fdescfs functional in 6.1?
- From: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:16:53 -0700
I guess I just expected it to print all character device entries for the
file descriptors open by my process.
Kind of like the old /dev/fd/1 /dev/fd/2 directories used to be under MAKEDEV...
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:18:48PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 28), Jaye Mathisen said:_______________________________________________
devfs is mounted, fdesc is unmounted:
s2# ls -l /dev/fd
total 0
crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 250, 0 Jul 25 03:25 0
crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 250, 1 Jul 25 03:28 1
crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 250, 2 Jul 25 03:27 2
Looks just like I think it should.
Then:
s2# mount -t fdescfs fdescfs /dev/fd
s2# ls -l /dev/fd
total 16
crw--w---- 1 root tty 5, 1 Jul 28 18:01 0
crw--w---- 1 root tty 5, 1 Jul 28 18:01 1
crw--w---- 1 root tty 5, 1 Jul 28 18:01 2
d-w------- 1 mailnull mailnull 512 Jul 23 00:01 3
d--------- 1 root wheel 512 Jul 25 03:25 4
s2# umount /dev/fd
This thing is all over the map.. permissions changed, a *directory*
for fd's 3 and 4?
What do you expect ls to open to print a *directory* listing? :)
fd's 0, 1, and 2 are /dev/tty, and the permissions look fine.
fd 3 is your current directory (so I guess you're in some smtp-related
directory?), and fd 4 is the directory on the commandline (/dev/fd).
--
Dan Nelson
dnelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
!DSPAM:44caf09f196113296012617!
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: fdescfs functional in 6.1?
- From: Rick C. Petty
- Re: fdescfs functional in 6.1?
- From: Dan Nelson
- Re: fdescfs functional in 6.1?
- References:
- fdescfs functional in 6.1?
- From: Jaye Mathisen
- Re: fdescfs functional in 6.1?
- From: Dan Nelson
- fdescfs functional in 6.1?
- Prev by Date: Re: fdescfs functional in 6.1?
- Next by Date: Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Previous by thread: Re: fdescfs functional in 6.1?
- Next by thread: Re: fdescfs functional in 6.1?
- Index(es):