Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:13:13 +0400
* Matthew Dillon (dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
felt that 8 partitions is restrictive. My main home server has 10About `lack' of partitions - don't forget that labels can be nested.
and the main DragonFly box has 11.
There is another solution for FreeBSD folks, however. You *DO* have
four slices to play with. You can put a disklabel with 8 partitions
in it on each one (for 32 total). It isn't as convenient, but it does
work.
Just do `bsdlabel -w /dev/ad0s1e` - you'll get /dev/ad0s1ea.
--
Best regards,
Dmitry mailto:amdmi3@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: David Gilbert
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Matthew Dillon
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- References:
- disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Andreas Klemm
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Andreas Klemm
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Matthew Dillon
- disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Prev by Date: Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Next by Date: i386 page fault clobbers error code in trap frame
- Previous by thread: Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Next by thread: Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|