Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
:
:* Matthew Dillon (dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
:
:> felt that 8 partitions is restrictive. My main home server has 10
:> and the main DragonFly box has 11.
:>
:> There is another solution for FreeBSD folks, however. You *DO* have
:> four slices to play with. You can put a disklabel with 8 partitions
:> in it on each one (for 32 total). It isn't as convenient, but it does
:> work.
:About `lack' of partitions - don't forget that labels can be nested.
:Just do `bsdlabel -w /dev/ad0s1e` - you'll get /dev/ad0s1ea.
:
:--
:Best regards,
: Dmitry mailto:amdmi3@xxxxxxx
Oh, very cute! A terrible hack if you ask me, but cute all the same!
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Dmitry Marakasov
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- References:
- disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Andreas Klemm
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Andreas Klemm
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Matthew Dillon
- Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- From: Dmitry Marakasov
- disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Prev by Date: Re: fdescfs functional in 6.1?
- Next by Date: Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Previous by thread: Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Next by thread: Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|