Re: numbers don't lie ...
- From: Danny Braniss <danny@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:13:38 +0300
In <E1GNOLq-000DC2-1Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Danny Braniss <danny@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> typed:
Im testing these 2 boxes, Sun X4100 and Dell-2950, and:
SUN X4100: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 280 (2393.19-MHz K8-class CPU)
one 70g sata disk
DELL 2950: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz (3192.98-MHz K8-class CPU)
4 sata disks + raid0
they both run identical 6.1-STABLE.
my 'cpu benchmark' shows the amd being much better than the intel.
but, doing a make buildworld give interesting results:
dell-2950 : make -j16 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 buildworld : 24m17.41s real 1h3m3.26s
user 17m15.07s sys
dell-2950 : make -j8 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 buildworld : 24m8.28s real 1h2m59.38s
user 16m16.20s sys
sunfire : make -j16 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 buildworld : 24m21.38s real 49m6.68s
user 14m22.64s sys
sunfire : make -j8 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 buildworld : 23m47.69s real 48m53.58s
user 13m44.81s sys
which probably says something about my 'cpu benchmark' :-(
Yes - that it's not very good at predicting performance on a parallel
make. That's not surprising, as it's true of most benchmarks. You
might want to check out some of the benchmarks in the ports tree as
well.
i've been using it since the days of the p90, and this is the first time
it has failed me! it only measures (or tries) the cpu performance on
some standard functions.
i did the tests with hyperbluffing disabled in the bios.
but why is the user time so much different between the boxes?
What's the CPU configuration? The AMD is dual core - is that it? Could
the Xeon be dual-core and hyperthreaded, so it's got that many more
CPUs to contribute towards user time?
To illustrate, I have numbers for "make -j4" for a P4 with and without
hyperthreading enabled:
machdep.hyperthreading_allowed: 1 -> 0
50m55.99s real 35m28s.19 user 8m20s.02 sys
machdep.hyperthreading_allowed: 0 -> 1
38m48s.85 real 55m2s.43 user 12m27s.90 sys
Note the effect of the second CPU on the user time.
now, since you asked i tried:
sysctl machdep.cpu_idle_hlt=0
machdep.cpu_idle_hlt: 1 -> 0
dell-2950 : make -j8 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 buildworld : 23m55.03s real 1h2m54.84s
user 16m48.79s sys
and no difference, by the way, i did this also changing the bios setting
(called logical cpus :-), but again, no difference.
so, this reminds me of an old joke about a spider without legs
does not hear conclusion: in this case hyper* does no affect
nothing.
but the original question stands: why is the user time between the boxes
so different, whyle the real time remains the same?
cheers,
danny
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: numbers don't lie ...
- From: Mike Meyer
- Re: numbers don't lie ...
- From: Oliver Fromme
- Re: numbers don't lie ...
- Prev by Date: Re: Issue with loading a module
- Next by Date: Re: numbers don't lie ...
- Previous by thread: Re: numbers don't lie ...
- Next by thread: Re: numbers don't lie ...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|