Re: Process Debugging questions
- From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:10:26 +0100
Hi Dag-Erling,
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 11:51:57PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
trowa-4 <trowa-4@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
FreeBSD provides the ptrace system call for controlling and
debugging the execution of a process.
An alternative to the ptrace system call is the /proc filesystem.
The functionality provided by the /proc filesystem is the same as
that provided by ptrace; if differs only in its interface.
Are there having a better method or other method?
They both suck, for different reasons. In theory, ptrace sucks less
than proc, but it lacks some of proc's functionality, and fixing that
is very hard.
Would you take a little time to tell what ptrace lacks and possibly
why it is so hard, please ?
Thank you.
--
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Process Debugging questions
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: Process Debugging questions
- References:
- Process Debugging questions
- From: trowa-4
- Re: Process Debugging questions
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Process Debugging questions
- Prev by Date: Re: Freeing free mbuff panic
- Next by Date: Re: Hardening FreeBSD, does anyone have any documentation that may help?
- Previous by thread: Re: Process Debugging questions
- Next by thread: Re: Process Debugging questions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|