Re: Process Debugging questions
- From: Robert Watson <rwatson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:21:59 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Robert Watson <rwatson@xxxxxxxxxxx> (from Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:55:37 +0000 (GMT)):
Anyone who wants to start looking at a new API should make sure they look at ptrace() and procfs across a range of platforms, and also look at Mach task ports and what they offer. One of the things we really can't do well with ptrace() today is inspect kernel state for a running process -- things like the VM layout, etc. We should make sure any next generation system allows this, because that feature alone is the reason why I sometimes mount procfs. :-)
Can you please elaborate what features you have in mind which DTrace isn't able to deliver?
/proc/curproc/map
Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Process Debugging questions
- From: Alexander Leidinger
- Re: Process Debugging questions
- References:
- Process Debugging questions
- From: trowa-4
- Re: Process Debugging questions
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: Process Debugging questions
- From: Jeremie Le Hen
- Re: Process Debugging questions
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: Process Debugging questions
- From: Robert Watson
- Re: Process Debugging questions
- From: Alexander Leidinger
- Process Debugging questions
- Prev by Date: Re: Hardening FreeBSD, does anyone have any documentation that may help?
- Next by Date: Re: Process Debugging questions
- Previous by thread: Re: Process Debugging questions
- Next by thread: Re: Process Debugging questions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|