Re: MS Vista vs FreeBSD's bootloader
- From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 05:04:55 +0200
pfgshield-freebsd@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
and wereHi;
FWIW, if you just got your new computer with Windows Vista installed
bootloaderhoping to dual boot FreeBSD on it, let me tell you that FreeBSD's
vistawill screw things up.
Microsoft basically declared the war on alternative OSs so it seems
doesn't like:
- bootloaders different than the one used by Vista.
- Making a non Vista partition active.
I can confirm this - messing with the boot sector will make Vista
unbootable, but it can be repaired with the installer (of course, you
lose FreeBSD at that point). It seems Vista uses registry or some other
binary format to store boot info (as opposed to WinXP which uses a text
file...) and it protects the boot loader for "DRM" reasons.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MS Vista vs FreeBSD's bootloader
- From: Darren Pilgrim
- Re: MS Vista vs FreeBSD's bootloader
- References:
- MS Vista vs FreeBSD's bootloader
- From: pfgshield-freebsd
- MS Vista vs FreeBSD's bootloader
- Prev by Date: Re: MS Vista vs FreeBSD's bootloader
- Next by Date: Re: MS Vista vs FreeBSD's bootloader
- Previous by thread: Re: MS Vista vs FreeBSD's bootloader
- Next by thread: Re: MS Vista vs FreeBSD's bootloader
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|