Re: MS Vista vs FreeBSD's bootloader
- From: Thomas Sparrevohn <Thomas.Sparrevohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:09:00 +0100
On Thursday 28 June 2007 14:44:05 pfgshield-freebsd@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
--- Thomas Sparrevohn <Thomas.Sparrevohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
...
Hmm...
I have Vista Home edition ruinning any FreeBSD without any problems and
without having to do anything special - That is on CURRENT
Installation order is important, perhaps you already had FreeBSD before
installing Vista? In my case Vista Premium came preinstalled, there was also a
FAT partition (with diagnostic stuff) and an NTFS for rescue purposes.
No - The originally came with XP - I nuked that and installed FreeBSD - However
I did nuke the XP totally before upgrading to Vista - It does overwrite the FreeBSD
MBR - I just rebooted using a CD and added the mbr again
Of course getting the new computer without Vista was not really an option :(,
but MS went too far this time, they removed postcript type1 font support and
they crippled OpenGL enough that major CAD packages don't work easily or have
something like 85% performance penalty.
Pedro.
___________________________________
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail: http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MS Vista vs FreeBSD's bootloader
- From: Tim Clewlow
- Re: MS Vista vs FreeBSD's bootloader
- References:
- Re: MS Vista vs FreeBSD's bootloader
- From: pfgshield-freebsd
- Re: MS Vista vs FreeBSD's bootloader
- Prev by Date: SII3512 rev0 ?
- Next by Date: Re: MS Vista vs FreeBSD's bootloader
- Previous by thread: Re: MS Vista vs FreeBSD's bootloader
- Next by thread: Re: MS Vista vs FreeBSD's bootloader
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|