Re: linuxolator problem on amd64
- From: sam <samflanker@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:06:39 +0400
Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Hello,
Peter Jeremy wrote:On 2007-Aug-22 12:13:48 +0400, sam <samflanker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Minimum system requirements:...
- Kernel 2.6, configured for 1000Hz tick and other low latency settings
FreeBSD currently only emulates kernel 2.4. Kernel 2.6 is a SoC project.
Take a look at /usr/ports/UPDATING : 20070327:
AFFECTS: users of emulators/linux_base-fc6
AUTHOR: bsam@xxxxxxxxxxx
ATTENTION! The port is experimental for now. Use it at your own risk. This
port may be used only with 7-CURRENT and compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16.
So it's not just a SoC project :)
Yes, Enemy Territory: Quake Wars server linux (ETQW)
working on FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT with port linux_base-fc6
/Vladimir Ermakov
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: linuxolator problem on amd64
- From: sam
- linuxolator problem on i386
- From: sam
- Re: linuxolator problem on amd64
- References:
- linuxolator problem on amd64
- From: sam
- Re: linuxolator problem on amd64
- From: Pieter de Goeje
- Re: linuxolator problem on amd64
- From: Roman Divacky
- Re: linuxolator problem on amd64
- From: sam
- Re: linuxolator problem on amd64
- From: Peter Jeremy
- Re: linuxolator problem on amd64
- From: Stefan Lambrev
- linuxolator problem on amd64
- Prev by Date: Re: modify syscall nr on-the-fly
- Next by Date: Re: process freeze (state *inp)
- Previous by thread: Re: linuxolator problem on amd64
- Next by thread: linuxolator problem on i386
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|