Re: Inner workings of turnstiles and sleepqueues
- From: John Baldwin <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:05:26 -0400
On Friday 19 October 2007 01:08:27 pm Attilio Rao wrote:
2007/10/19, John Baldwin <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxx>:comments in
On Friday 19 October 2007 12:56:54 am Ed Schouten wrote:
* John Baldwin <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The best option right now is to read the code. There are some
higher-levelboth the headers and implementation.
Would it be useful to write manpages for these interfaces, or do we
assume that only godlike people can use them anyway? I am willing to
write manpages for them.
They already exist, but they really are only used to implement
shouldprimitives like locks and condition variables. The rest of the kernel
use the higher-level primitives anyway.
Well, really turnstiles don't have manpages, but this is still OK as
they are only used in mutex while the "real" sleeping primitive should
be identified by sleepqueues.
Ah, there is a sleepqueue(9), but not a turnstile(9).
--
John Baldwin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Inner workings of turnstiles and sleepqueues
- From: Ed Schouten
- Re: Inner workings of turnstiles and sleepqueues
- From: John Baldwin
- Re: Inner workings of turnstiles and sleepqueues
- From: Attilio Rao
- Inner workings of turnstiles and sleepqueues
- Prev by Date: Re: Inner workings of turnstiles and sleepqueues
- Next by Date: Re: Pluggable Disk Scheduler Project
- Previous by thread: Re: Inner workings of turnstiles and sleepqueues
- Next by thread: Re: Inner workings of turnstiles and sleepqueues
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|