Re: idea bouncing: using cvs as a replacement for mergemaster

On Nov 27, 2007, at 7:45 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I was thinking seeing the fact that I already have a cvs repo of
- -current does it make sense to just use CVS to update /etc instead of
mergemaster... if so any ideas on doing it cleanly?

- --
Aryeh M. Friedman
Developer, not business, friendly
http://www.flosoft-systems.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHTORVJ9+1V27SttsRAqcuAJ4sW4ObPrnUi6az4T+NQebCVMbDCQCfUS+i
gCRv9mwC2mu6B4LAPZ9bW3s=
=tD/k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


CVS sucks and I wouldn't wish that requirement on anyone for their base system..
There isn't a decent idiot-proof / foolproof system out there for defeating merging issues...
-Garrett

_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"