Re: BSD license compatible hash algorithm?
- From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 14:17:27 +1100
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 06:32:21PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Anyhow, thanks for the ideas I really do appreciate it. Overall, I think I
will stick with BDB's hash(3) (seems less data collision prone, as was
pointed out earlier, and less of a security risk) as I wasn't aware of the
NULL argument, no filename 'clause' with dbopen(3).
Other option might be the Fowler/Noll/Vo Hash in <sys/fnv_hash.h>
--
Peter Jeremy
Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement
an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.
Attachment:
pgp32Fx8s1Gei.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- BSD license compatible hash algorithm?
- From: Garrett Cooper
- Re: BSD license compatible hash algorithm?
- From: Brooks Davis
- Re: BSD license compatible hash algorithm?
- From: Garrett Cooper
- Re: BSD license compatible hash algorithm?
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: BSD license compatible hash algorithm?
- From: Garrett Cooper
- BSD license compatible hash algorithm?
- Prev by Date: Architectures with strict alignment?
- Next by Date: Re: Architectures with strict alignment?
- Previous by thread: Re: BSD license compatible hash algorithm?
- Next by thread: trap 12 with interrupts disabled, need help
- Index(es):