Re: Architectures with strict alignment?
- From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:12:04 +0200
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:14:11AM -0800, Kip Macy wrote:
Isn't it everything except x86?x86 has the AC bit in the eflags. The AM bit in cr0 is enabled by the
-Kip
kernel, and AC could be switched on by LD_PRELOADed shared object.
Last time I checked, our libc caused unaligned access in the locale
initialization code.
On Dec 29, 2007 12:11 AM, Erich Dollansky <oceanare@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,_______________________________________________
Ivan Voras wrote:
Hi,isn't this the case with SPARC and Itanium?
Which of the architectures FreeBSD supports (if any) have strict memory
alignment requirements? (in the sense that accessing a 32-bit integer
not aligned on a 32-bit address results in a hardware trap/exception).
I know, they are 64 bits.
Erich
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
Attachment:
pgpHmtZ5GdCcp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Architectures with strict alignment?
- From: Kostik Belousov
- Re: Architectures with strict alignment?
- References:
- Architectures with strict alignment?
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: Architectures with strict alignment?
- From: Erich Dollansky
- Re: Architectures with strict alignment?
- From: Kip Macy
- Architectures with strict alignment?
- Prev by Date: Re: Architectures with strict alignment?
- Next by Date: Re: BSD license compatible hash algorithm?
- Previous by thread: Re: Architectures with strict alignment?
- Next by thread: Re: Architectures with strict alignment?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
- kernel oops...
... I've just add two hangs with a plain vanilla kernel 2.4.21 on a Debian ... Aug
8 21:15:01 www kernel: CPU: 0 ... Aug 8 21:15:01 www kernel: EFLAGS: 00010282 ...
# Loadable module support ... (Linux-Kernel) - Re: Oops with 2.4.23 in kswapd
... > These are useless until you run them through ksymoops... ... If the current
kernel and/or modules do not match the log, ... EFLAGS: 00010207 ... Process
rsync (pid: 5586, stackpage=c6e95000) ... (Linux-Kernel) - Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related?
... I can't keep running this kernel - nearly all of our ... but a reboot
is needed ... RSP: 0018:ffff81017b6bfe18 EFLAGS: 00010256 ... (Linux-Kernel) - 2.6.16.18 crash on HP DL585
... Yesterday I have tried to upgrade our quad-opteron HP DL585 ... to a newer kernel
(2.6.16.18, ... Fedora Core 5 compilers). ... RSP: 0018:ffff8105bf13fb10 EFLAGS:
00000286 ... (Linux-Kernel)