Re: Architectures with strict alignment?
- From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:12:04 +0200
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:14:11AM -0800, Kip Macy wrote:
Isn't it everything except x86?x86 has the AC bit in the eflags. The AM bit in cr0 is enabled by the
-Kip
kernel, and AC could be switched on by LD_PRELOADed shared object.
Last time I checked, our libc caused unaligned access in the locale
initialization code.
On Dec 29, 2007 12:11 AM, Erich Dollansky <oceanare@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,_______________________________________________
Ivan Voras wrote:
Hi,isn't this the case with SPARC and Itanium?
Which of the architectures FreeBSD supports (if any) have strict memory
alignment requirements? (in the sense that accessing a 32-bit integer
not aligned on a 32-bit address results in a hardware trap/exception).
I know, they are 64 bits.
Erich
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
Attachment:
pgpHmtZ5GdCcp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Architectures with strict alignment?
- From: Kostik Belousov
- Re: Architectures with strict alignment?
- References:
- Architectures with strict alignment?
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: Architectures with strict alignment?
- From: Erich Dollansky
- Re: Architectures with strict alignment?
- From: Kip Macy
- Architectures with strict alignment?
- Prev by Date: Re: Architectures with strict alignment?
- Next by Date: Re: BSD license compatible hash algorithm?
- Previous by thread: Re: Architectures with strict alignment?
- Next by thread: Re: Architectures with strict alignment?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
