Re: printing boot probe messages
- From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:45:35 +1100
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 04:34:05PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
astonishment (and embarrassment) others have replied using that ridiculous
nomenclature "Print#1 and Print#2". Doesn't that seem more than a little
ridiculous to you?
The only distinction the kernel makes is between "verbose boot" and
"non-verbose boot". Based on your description of what you did, both
"Print#1" and "Print#2" are "verbose boot". If you are seeing a
difference then it is something local to your system.
--
Peter Jeremy
Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement
an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.
Attachment:
pgpVAosSP6tPM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: printing boot probe messages
- From: Chuck Robey
- Re: printing boot probe messages
- From: Bernd Walter
- Re: printing boot probe messages
- From: Chuck Robey
- Re: printing boot probe messages
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: printing boot probe messages
- From: Chuck Robey
- Re: printing boot probe messages
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: printing boot probe messages
- From: Chuck Robey
- Re: printing boot probe messages
- From: Erik Trulsson
- Re: printing boot probe messages
- From: Jeremy Chadwick
- Re: printing boot probe messages
- From: Chuck Robey
- Re: printing boot probe messages
- Prev by Date: Re: printing boot probe messages
- Next by Date: Re: printing boot probe messages
- Previous by thread: Re: printing boot probe messages
- Next by thread: Re: printing boot probe messages
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|