Re: Csup cvsmode build discussion
- From: Ulf Lilleengen <lulf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:37:06 +0100
On ons, jan 16, 2008 at 04:15:53pm +0100, Philip Paeps wrote:
On 2008-01-16 16:06:56 (+0100), Ulf Lilleengen <lulf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Excellent, thank you for your work on this Philip.
However, this might only fix the issue with yacc if I'm thinking correctly,
because the lexer also needs to be told about this for reentrancy. (But
perhaps a much smaller problem since it's a matter of updating the lex
version in base).
I found that updating the lex in base was surprisingly easy. :-) I'll clean
up my patches and post them for review later this evening.
I also found a good way to do what I planned. I'll use the updated flex in
base, and then write the parser in C. This shouldn't be too hard since I have
a tokenizer and just need to assert the correct structure of the file. This
way I won't have to deal with yacc at all, which is sort of a relief :)
--
Ulf Lilleengen
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Csup cvsmode build discussion
- From: Ulf Lilleengen
- Re: Csup cvsmode build discussion
- From: Bob Bishop
- Re: Csup cvsmode build discussion
- From: Ulf Lilleengen
- Re: Csup cvsmode build discussion
- From: Bob Bishop
- Re: Csup cvsmode build discussion
- From: Ulf Lilleengen
- Re: Csup cvsmode build discussion
- From: Philip Paeps
- Csup cvsmode build discussion
- Prev by Date: Re: Is Elf formatdocumented anywhere?
- Next by Date: Reading from sound card broken in perelease?
- Previous by thread: Re: Csup cvsmode build discussion
- Next by thread: Re: Csup cvsmode build discussion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|